Re: MANIFEST.SKIP deleted on distclean?
[email protected] (Eric Wilhelm) Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:11:44 -0700
| Newsgroups | perl.module.build |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> 9354365A-49C6-11DF-A0C6-D033EE7EF46B-40644810!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com |
# from David Golden # on Friday 16 April 2010 10:54: >On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Eric Wilhelm <[email protected]> wrote: >> Or, dirty hacks: >> >> my $orig = \&ExtUtils::Manifest::maniskip; >> local *ExtUtils::Manifest::maniskip = sub { > >-1 Dirty hacks lead to maintenance headaches later. > # But before Eric wrote that, he said: >>Or replace ExtUtils::Manifest with something that doesn't use the >>filesystem as its primary API? Dancing around some old clunky code that just looks like a pile of monkey patches swinging from a tree of assumptions is a lot more maintainable than a pile of monkey patches to make it take input via variables instead of the filesystem? --Eric -- "Insert random misquote here" --------------------------------------------------- http://scratchcomputing.com ---------------------------------------------------