Re: Moosifying Test-Run Part 2: Probably Not

On Mon, 2 Jun 2008, Jonathan Swartz wrote:

>> Yes, but to me it seems that it beats the point of using Moose. If I'm
>> using Moose, I'd rather have type-checking, so people will know what
>> every class member is.
>
> Is it possible to tell Moose to skip type-checking for particular classes? 
> That way, one could insert the types solely for declarative purposes, or 
> could turn on type-checking only in the development version of an 
> application, or turn off checking for performance critical classes.
>
> The FAQ mentions this will likely be "in the next release", not sure when 
> that was written. :)

I think the best way to do it would be to include it as an option to 
immutabilization, since it would then be a simple matter of simply not 
generating the constraint check code.


-dave

/*==========================
VegGuide.Org
Your guide to all that's veg
==========================*/