Re: Accessor methods questions

2011/8/21 Nick Perez <[email protected]>

> On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 22:27:59 +0200
> Gunnar Strand <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps the pattern is that if an accessor must store a value....
> -SNIP-
>
> No, this is overly complicated. 'has()' is just a sugar function to
> install an accessor into your class. This accessor's behavior (and what
> methods are generated) are controlled by the arguments given to
> 'has()'. There really is nothing magical going on here. I promise.
>

Aaa, now it all makes sense. I was stuck in the loop thinking I could
implement the accessor methods myself.


> Barring that, bugging people in IRC probably makes more sense as it is
> more interactive than doing email. You can also search the archives of
> this mailing list for answers to more general Moose usage questions.
>

Yes, but also more difficult to convey clear meaning since sometimes
verbosity is needed.

Thanks for shedding light on this.

BR
Gunnar