Re: MooseX::FSA::Simple

I think a MooseX::Role::* module would be generally understood to be
an extension of the Moose role API. Thus an actual role offered up on
CPAN wouldn't have "Role" in its namespace.

-- 
Richard Simões
Internet


On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 8:01 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have written a new module along the lines of FSA::Rules, only as a Moose Role.
>
> Is it convention that Moose Roles are in the MooseX::Role namespace so I would call the module MooseX::Role::FSA::Simple, or can I call it MooseX::FSA::Simple?
>
> Regards
> Ian
>
> --
>
>
>
> This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential, may contain
> proprietary or privileged information and is intended for the named
> recipient(s) only. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action
> on the basis of information in this e-mail and must delete all copies.
> Nomura will not accept responsibility or liability for the accuracy or
> completeness of, or the presence of any virus or disabling code in, this
> e-mail. If verification is sought please request a hard copy. Any reference
> to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as preliminary only
> and subject to formal written confirmation by Nomura. Nomura reserves the
> right to monitor e-mail communications through its networks (in accordance
> with applicable laws). No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by
> Nomura by any mistransmission of this e-mail. Any reference to "Nomura" is
> a reference to any entity in the Nomura Holdings, Inc. group. Please read
> our Electronic Communications Legal Notice which forms part of this e-mail:
> http://www.Nomura.com/email_disclaimer.htm
>
>