Re: MooseX::FSA::Simple
[email protected] (Dave Rolsky)
| Newsgroups | perl.moose |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, [email protected] wrote: > I have written a new module along the lines of FSA::Rules, only as a Moose Role. > > Is it convention that Moose Roles are in the MooseX::Role namespace so I > would call the module MooseX::Role::FSA::Simple, or can I call it > MooseX::FSA::Simple? I'd really prefer that MooseX _only_ be used for extensions to Moose (at the meta level). That said, another namespace for modules designed to work with other Moose _using_ modules might be useful. No good names come to mind right now, though. -dave /*============================================================ http://VegGuide.org http://blog.urth.org Your guide to all that's veg House Absolute(ly Pointless) ============================================================*/