Re: MooseX::FSA::Simple

Am 21.09.2011 um 13:18 schrieb Hans Dieter Pearcey:

> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:28 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Does FSA::MooseRole satisfy everyone (or no-one)?
> 
> I hate it.  It seems like unnecessary noise.
> 
> If the distinguishing feature of this code is that it is a role, then
> name it FSA::Role or FSA::Rules::Role or something.  In that case, I
> don't think the fact that there are non-Moose roles matters very much;
> you're encoding information about the API ("this package needs a class
> to consume it").
> 
> hdp.

The question is, how would someone name his dist who wants to release a
version of FSA::Role, which uses Role::Basic as Role framework?

I think we need something like Any::Role :-)

Cheers,
mo