Re: hash of objects inside an instance
[email protected] (Erik Colson)
| Newsgroups | perl.moose |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 28 Nov 2011, at 17:46, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote: > No, what you want is an abstraction. > > Basically you're trying to hack in something that's actually business-information connecting several objects. > > In relational databases, you know it'd be wrong to do something like this in the employee table; the principle is much the same here. yep > Maybe add an extra class WorksFor[1] containing the cost and department, and have a list of WorksFor in employee. (Warning, very little thought went into this and all my brain-blood is occupied around full stomach, but it solves the basic problem :) ) that's what I was afraid for. This creates a lot of overhead by creating all the necessary objects. I implemented it using a EmployeeDepartment class as would be the case when using RDBS. It works well, but I hope the app won't get too slow because of this... I just hoped Moose would have some kind of magic allowing to have objects as hash keys... best and thank you all for the help! -- erik
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 455 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO1Cd/AAoJEIgjtVOAAL1G+bUIAICTYcMPP8/7BpHknO1ccElb unYzGv/N1WWyPk5p/dL24G0/qPhKOWCGz4/wl4AkWb2dFdEnpV9VlwPmTDBYNxkD bAyVmwXaJQN/ljZqp72aZZatsSWkLdXaStxoDw8/6zggfChzGSNUfOgTOEuyQ+FN gcYEoGTQxRdGu7+q/Nl1OvGJ3rIT/WkfJRmTz42BdEPCN7fJEofb4WwFKXt37b3D 9x/y8VnNlO/QLN/lzDYloUyoMnDAcpsF5iFGXdJ8woHRrmiqXGvrL42RRWvimhE5 onwrKxtY5X/rI/uNMBp6oQrWAvPaAWCMH7n/t6tddK17EsLQyHZSMCNz3Jbb5bc= =80wN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----