Re: Naming convention for "Moosified" CPAN modules

On Aug 5, 2012, at 4:28 AM, Jim Bacon wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I have a module on CPAN that I want to add a Moose version to. What is the
> naming convention for this?
> 
> The current module is DateTimeX::Fiscal::Fiscal5253. My gut tells me that
> the "Moosified" version should be DateTimeX::Fiscal::Fiscal5253::Moose so
> users have fair warning that it will pull in Moose if they are not already
> using it. (The purpose of the new module is to have one that plays nice with
> Moose for those who already use it. There are a number of enhancements I can
> make that are trivial with Moose.)
> 

I am interested to know what about the old module didn't play well with Moose? And in what ways?

Moose was always designed to interoperate with non-Moose code and there are a number of excellent modules out there to smooth this process (MooseX::NonMoose being the most obvious).

- Stevan