Re: Help choosing a Module name
[email protected] (Dave Rolsky)
| Newsgroups | perl.moose |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 8 Oct 2012, Jed Lund wrote: > I wrap two changes around Moose::Meta::Class->create in my proposal. I > accept named hash value pairs for everything including a new package name > where ->class() expects the new name as the first argument. Actually, Moose already accepts key/value pairs for this method, but this is documented (this thing with multiple calling styles is something I really hate in the Moose core). Most (but not all) methods of the ->method( $name, %args ) style also work with ->method( name => $name, %args ). Substitute the "name" key for "package" or whatever is appropriate. Anyway, calling this MooseX::Util::ClassBuilder seems kind of weird since Moose already has plenty of class building support. It's more like MooseX::ShortCut::BuildClass or something. -dave /*============================================================ http://VegGuide.org http://blog.urth.org Your guide to all that's veg House Absolute(ly Pointless) ============================================================*/