Re: Help choosing a Module name

Dave,

I must have overlooked the "name => $name," option in the documentation.
 Thank you for pointing it out.

I also appreciate the the suggestion for a module namespace.  I am happy to
acknowledge that what I am attempting is a shortcut only.

Best Regards,

Jed

On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Dave Rolsky <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, 8 Oct 2012, Jed Lund wrote:
>
>  I wrap two changes around Moose::Meta::Class->create in my proposal.  I
>> accept named hash value pairs for everything including a new package name
>> where ->class() expects the new name as the first argument.
>>
>
> Actually, Moose already accepts key/value pairs for this method, but this
> is documented (this thing with multiple calling styles is something I
> really hate in the Moose core).
>
> Most (but not all) methods of the ->method( $name, %args ) style also work
> with ->method( name => $name, %args ). Substitute the "name" key for
> "package" or whatever is appropriate.
>
> Anyway, calling this MooseX::Util::ClassBuilder seems kind of weird since
> Moose already has plenty of class building support.
>
> It's more like MooseX::ShortCut::BuildClass or something.
>
>
>
> -dave
>
> /*============================**==============================**==
> http://VegGuide.org               http://blog.urth.org
> Your guide to all that's veg      House Absolute(ly Pointless)
> ==============================**==============================***/
>