Re: BUILD called twice.

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Dave Rolsky <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> But as you point out, what you did is just wrong anyway. The whole point
> of BUILD is that defining it in subclasses doesn't hide the parent's
> implementation.
>
> The only time you need modifiers on BUILD is when you want a role to
> modify BUILD.
>

Hum, ok, so on a related question:

What's the correct approach if you need to completely override a BUILD in a
base class with a replacement version in a subclass?  That is you do not
want the baseclass BUILD to run?



-- 
Bill Moseley
[email protected]