Re: Benchmarking Moo(se)?
[email protected] ("Chris Prather") Sat, 25 Jul 2015 09:43:37 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | perl.moose |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1437842616375.4fef8683@Nodemailer> |
------Nodemailer-0.5.0-?=_1-1437842617081 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday, Jul 25, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Graham Knop <[email protected]>, = wrote: On 7/24/15 8:00 PM, Aran Deltac wrote: > Hey all, I put together some benchmarks: >=20 > https://github.com/bluefeet/Moo-se-Bench >=20 > Let me know if you have any ideas/thoughts/criticisms. >=20 > Aran It would be worth comparing Moo with and without Class::XSAccessor installed. Moo will automatically use it for simple accessors if it's available, and then will easily outperform Moose. =E2=80=8B =E2=80=8BWhich makes me wonder if we shouldn't look at something similar = for Moose itself. =E2=80=8B =E2=80=8B-Chris ------Nodemailer-0.5.0-?=_1-1437842617081 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC =22-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN=22 = =22http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd=22> <html><body><div id=3D=22mbx-wrapper=22> <div id=3D=22mbx-content=22 class=3D=22content=22 onfocus=3D=22didBecomeFir= stResponder()=22 contenteditable=3D=22true=22 onblur=3D=22didBlur()=22><br>= </div> <div id=3D=22mbx-old-email=22 contenteditable=3D=22true=22> <div class=3D=22mailbox=5Fsignature=22 style=3D=22display: = block;=22><br></div> <span id=3D=22orc-full-body-initial-text=22 style=3D=22display: = inline;=22><br>On Saturday, Jul 25, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Graham Knop <<a = href=3D=22mailto:[email protected]=22 target=3D=22=5Fblank=22>haarg@haarg.= org</a>>, wrote:<br></span><blockquote class=3D=22gmail=5Fquote=22>On = 7/24/15 8:00 PM, Aran Deltac wrote: <br>> Hey all, I put together some benchmarks: <br>>=20 <br>> https://github.com/bluefeet/Moo-se-Bench <br>>=20 <br>> Let me know if you have any ideas/thoughts/criticisms. <br>>=20 <br>> Aran <br><br>It would be worth comparing Moo with and without Class::XSAccessor <br>installed. Moo will automatically use it for simple accessors if it's <br>available, and then will easily outperform Moose. <br> </blockquote> <blockquote class=3D=22gmail=5Fquote=22></blockquote> <span class=3D=22mailbox-inline-edit=22>​</span><div></div> <span class=3D=22mailbox-inline-edit=22>​Which makes me wonder if we = shouldn't look at something similar for Moose itself.</span><div></div> <span class=3D=22mailbox-inline-edit=22>​</span><div></div> <span class=3D=22mailbox-inline-edit=22>​-Chris</span><div> <br><div> <br><div> <br><blockquote class=3D=22gmail=5Fquote=22><br></blockquote> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div></body></html> ------Nodemailer-0.5.0-?=_1-1437842617081--