Re: Moose -> Mouse -> Mouse::Tiny/Muscle

David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Sep 9, 2008, at 01:20, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> 
>> I looked at just copying in Mouse, but Mouse has dependencies which
>> themselves
>> have dependencies, some of them with XS.  Ideally, what I want is
>> Mouse::Tiny,
>> or as I like to put it, "Muscle". [2]  A stand-alone, single file, no
>> non-core
>> dependencies, 5.6 compatible implementation of 80% of Moose.  That way
>> I can
>> just copy it into the Test::Builder2 distribution and have a real OO
>> system.
> 
> It's not a MOP implementation, but for something dead simple, see
> Object::Tiny.

What Object::Tiny glosses over in all it's self-congratulatory, back-patting
advertising^Wdocumentation is that it produces read-only objects.  It's
breathtakingly limited.  All it buys you is some read-only accessors,
whoopty-do, I can write that myself.


> Or see Class::Meta, which depends only on Class::ISA and Data::Types.
> The latter can be omitted if you don't need data validation.

I'll have a look, but on first glance it appears to be missing roles, which I
want to play with.


-- 
Just call me 'Moron Sugar'.
	http://www.somethingpositive.net/sp05182002.shtml