Re: Multiple coercions ?

[email protected] (Stevan Little)
Newsgroups perl.moose
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I think a single ML is sufficient for now and the different types of  
queries can be divided by threading. The list is still relatively low  
traffic with a pretty decent signal-to-noise I think.

However, yeah at some point that might be useful to split it up, but  
until then there is IRC :)

- Stevan


On Sep 24, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Charles Alderman wrote:

> Meta questions:
>
> Is the purpose of this list to only report bugs or discuss design  
> questions?  Or is it to help out Moose users?  Should the list be  
> split into moose-dev and moose-users?
>
> Perhaps if a user happens to overlook the version they're running  
> before asking a question, it could be accepted as a newbie question  
> in a moose-users list conversation.
>
> Thanks,
> Charles Alderman
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Dave Rolsky <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:14:49 -0500 (CDT)
> Re: Re: Multiple coercions ?
>
>> Ok, Moose _0.58_ was just released, and you're reporting bugs in  
>> 0.31,
>> which was released approximately 10 months ago?
>>
>> Why?
>>
>>
>> -dave
>>
>> /*==========================
>> VegGuide.Org
>> Your guide to all that's veg
>> ==========================*/
>
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.