Re: [rt.cpan.org #40848] Inherited modified attributes destroy up-chain method-modifiers

On Nov 15, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Michael Potter wrote:
>>
> Fine. I would love to know a straightforward work-around though,  
> that does
> not drastically alter class structures. Would it be to much to ask  
> for an
> option to 'has +' that simply disables any accessor generation (and
> provides/curries methods), that is totally *use-at-own-risk* and would
> assume all the appropriate methods were installed in the base class?


Something like:

has +foo => (
     inherit_accessors => (1|0)
);

wouldn't be too objectionable, however before we put that into core I  
would like to see if as a MooseX:: module so we can work out all the  
possible issues first.

- Stevan