Re: playing nice with non-moose classes

Yes, that should Just Work (tm).

- Stevan

On Jan 23, 2009, at 12:26 PM, Sean Allen wrote:

> so,
>
> i'm trying out moose for some real work for the first time. i'm not  
> entirely clear on one thing.
> if i want to have an attribute that is an instance of a class that  
> isnt a moose class, is this all
> i have to do
>
> use NotMooseClass;
>
> has 'not_moose' => ( is => 'rw', isa => 'NotMooseClass' );
>
> i'm 99% certain that is right BUT... if it isn't i'm obviously  
> missing something basic so i figured,
> best to ask first because, if i got that wrong, lord knows what else  
> i'm getting wrong.
>