Re: playing nice with non-moose classes

Just wanted to make sure on that. I never felt completely confident...  
never a good feeling.

On Jan 23, 2009, at 4:44 PM, Stevan Little wrote:

> Yes, that should Just Work (tm).
>
> - Stevan
>
> On Jan 23, 2009, at 12:26 PM, Sean Allen wrote:
>
>> so,
>>
>> i'm trying out moose for some real work for the first time. i'm not  
>> entirely clear on one thing.
>> if i want to have an attribute that is an instance of a class that  
>> isnt a moose class, is this all
>> i have to do
>>
>> use NotMooseClass;
>>
>> has 'not_moose' => ( is => 'rw', isa => 'NotMooseClass' );
>>
>> i'm 99% certain that is right BUT... if it isn't i'm obviously  
>> missing something basic so i figured,
>> best to ask first because, if i got that wrong, lord knows what  
>> else i'm getting wrong.
>>
>