Re: Accessor to module

Bianka,

On Jun 1, 2007, at 4:24 AM, Bianka Martinovic wrote:
>> Actually, it shouldn't be, it should only call the 'default' sub  
>> the first time the ->loader accessor is called. After that, it  
>> stores the newly create CM::Module::Loader instance.
>
> Well, to be more precise: It happens if a _submodule_ calls the  
> accessor (for the first time). I think Eric is right, it's by  
> design (and surely correct), I don't think it's a bug.

Yes, Eric is correct.

> I just wanted to hear if my solution is a proper way, or if I  
> missed something.

And actually, your solution with the package variable was fine,  
although I tend to agree with Eric that it would be better for that  
responsibility to be in the CM::Module::Loader's new method.

> By the way, I really like this module, though I'm afraid that I  
> don't get all it's possibilities by now. ;)

Thanks :)

Honestly, I am still discovering possibilities (and combinations of  
possibilities) with Moose/Class::MOP myself.

- Stevan