Re: Accessor to module

Hello Stevan.

Thanks a lot for your response.

Stevan Little schrieb:
> 
> And actually, your solution with the package variable was fine, although 
> I tend to agree with Eric that it would be better for that 
> responsibility to be in the CM::Module::Loader's new method.
> 
Well, I'm a <understatement>bit</understatement> lazy, so I like to 
inherit the Moose::Object's new method... ;)

>> By the way, I really like this module, though I'm afraid that I don't 
>> get all it's possibilities by now. ;)
> 
> Thanks :)
> 
> Honestly, I am still discovering possibilities (and combinations of 
> possibilities) with Moose/Class::MOP myself.

Just write a Cookbook article for each, so we all can participate in 
your discoveries. ;) (Just kidding.)
I'd love to get more into depth, but I'm afraid I need some more 'Moose 
explained for fools' recipes. *smile* (Rhymes nice, doesn't it?) We have 
the acronym 'DAU' in Germany, which stands for 'Dümmster anzunehmender 
User'. You may translate this as 'worst case idiot'. ;) I will go on 
reading the man pages and all I can get else to learn more.

Greetings, Bianka