Re: NPW 2010 proposal
[email protected] (Jonas Brømsø Nielsen) Wed, 27 May 2009 13:36:31 +0200
| Newsgroups | perl.nordic.workshop |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Andrew, IMHO you just need to remove the 2010 from the name (see my previous =20 mail). Then you are free to do whatever you want with the NPW concept. =20= Meaning organize a Perl workshop in Baltikum whenever it pleases you =20 and feel free to use this list if you need assistance. Any objections? jonasbn On 27/05/2009, at 13.24, Andrew Shitov wrote: > Hi, > > Would you please let me ask if you have any standard procedure or such > in terms of defining deadlines. I mean, I'd like to know when the > proposal is marked as accepted or rejected. > > Thanks. > > > > > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Jonas Br=F8ms=F8 Nielsen > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hola, >> >> My point was that: >> >> - NPW is aimed at local community, users and sponsors >> >> So we can have a NPW in Baltikum no problem, it is simply a matter =20= >> of JFID. >> >> But at the same time I want to emphasize that it is just a workshop =20= >> and any >> other party can organize a NPW in 2010 in addition if the local =20 >> user base >> and potential organizers feel like it, so perhaps it is time to =20 >> remove the >> year identifier from the name and refer to: NPW <city>. >> >> I am afraid that we are creating a new YAPC, which was never the =20 >> idea. >> Workshop used to be the general label for these non-YAPC mini =20 >> conferences. >> >> The annual scheduling has been good at helping us to keep =20 >> continuity, but >> expending the area, so we now look at: Denmark, Sweden, Norway, =20 >> Finland, >> Iceland and Baltikum - will give us at hard time building a =20 >> foundation for >> continuity for local groups and users. So perhaps the NPW tag =20 >> should just be >> set free and anybody can organize a NPW. >> >> We could also stick to the annual round-robin scheme and then =20 >> organizers >> would have to wait their turn or local organizers should organize =20 >> something >> else, like hackathons etc. >> >> NPW is becoming a good brand and we just need to keep the brand =20 >> alive - also >> locally. >> >> jonasbn >> >> On 15/05/2009, at 13.00, Salve J Nilsen wrote: >> >>> Jonas Br=F8ms=F8 Nielsen said: >>>> >>>> I am actually more keen on the idea of a Baltic Perl Workshop, =20 >>>> traveling >>>> between the 3 countries. I am not saying that we will not promote =20= >>>> it and a >>>> lot of people will probably attend. >>> >>> I'd love to see NPW include the Baltic states. >>> >>> I got the impression that the Baltics are quite interested in moving >>> closer to the nordic countries, and with the long history they =20 >>> have with >>> especially Finland, Sweden and Denmark, I think it would be nice =20 >>> to let them >>> arrange a Nordic Perl Workshop. Let's welcome them into the =20 >>> community with >>> open arms. :) >>> >>> Of course, if the locals (should we find someone willing) rather =20 >>> would >>> call it a Baltic Perl Workshop, I think that's fine too. But =20 >>> saying they >>> can't call it NPW because of some old history or notion of what's =20= >>> "Nordic" >>> just reeks old-school (cold war) politics, IMO. >>> >>> But in the end, the locals who organize such an event should make =20= >>> the >>> decision themselves, and if they would like to use the NPW name, =20 >>> we should >>> allow it. >>> >>> We made a rule that NPW should be in the Nordic countries, and we =20= >>> can >>> change this rule just as easy as we can make it. >>> >>> >>> - Salve >>> >>> -- >>> #!/usr/bin/perl >>> sub AUTOLOAD{$AUTOLOAD=3D~/.*::(\d+)/;seek(DATA,$1,0);print# Salve =20= >>> Joshua >>> Nilsen >>> getc DATA}$"=3D"'};&{'";@_=3Dunpack("C*",unpack("u*",':4@,$'.# >>> <[email protected]> >>> '2!--"5-(50P%$PL,!0X354UC-PP%/0\`'."\n"));eval "&{'@_'}"; =20 >>> __END__ is >>> near! :) >> >> > > > > --=20 > Andrew Shitov > ______________________________________________________________________ > [email protected] | http://shitov.ru