Re: implementing a set of queue-processing servers

Matt Sergeant writes:
> > of these in POE than Apache.  The more eyes, the fewer the defects.
> 
> As someone who has worked on POE, and has a *great* deal of respect for 
> Rocco, I would really like to see that backed up. I haven't seen any 
> exploits in POE during my 2 years of using it, neither private nor 
> public. Got any example exploits, or any CVS changes that fixed an 
> exploit? (that's all public data)

I'm sorry.  I didn't mean to impugn anybody's credibility.


The data are available that show the more people reviewing code, the
more reliable it is.

Rob