Re: PHP is the scourge
[email protected] (Dave Rolsky) Tue, 7 Dec 2004 13:42:14 -0600 (CST)
| Newsgroups | perl.p5ee |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Richard Dice wrote: > Dave, > >> I think it does an ok job, but that's not really it's goal. I also don't >> think this is super important. You pick a particular DBMS because you >> think it's the right tool for the job. Only in a few rare cases (apps >> written for wide distribution) is there any reason to consider portability >> across DBMS backends. > > Good point. > > From a framework author's point of view, the framework should be able to work > with whatever database the app developer deems to be the correct one for > their situation. (I believe this is just the logical extension to what you > were saying.) Yep, pretty much. So-called "database independence" is something sought our by people who don't know much about databases, IMO. If you're just treating your SQL DBMS like a filesystem or "object store", you're missing out on all the power the DBMS can provide if you actually use it properly. -dave /*=========================== VegGuide.Org Your guide to all that's veg. ===========================*/