Re: PlRPC vs POE as core P5EE Server
[email protected] (Perrin Harkins)
| Newsgroups | perl.p5ee |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stephen Adkins wrote: > Yes, I like Apache/mod_perl for everything that can be satisfied > within a short period of time (i.e. synchronous calls). > However, when I initiate tasks from a browser which take a long time, > I think the work needs to be offloaded to another server... one that > can stick around and do the work. I don't see how another server is more able to "stick around" than mod_perl. You can simply send back a "message received" indication, cut the connection to the client, and do the work. > Furthermore, > requests need to be queued. This is not a good use for a web server. > Thus the need for another server. A system for processing queues is very different from an RPC server. Any of these servers (including mod_perl) would be good for putting requests in the queue, but for processing the queue you would want something different, like a simple forked daemon that has no RPC component. - Perrin