Re: Are Email::* modules unmaintained?

[email protected] Mon, 8 Oct 2018 14:30:57 +0200
Newsgroups perl.pep
Message-ID <20181008123057.iue4wyhdzmpam7uh@pali>
On Thursday 09 August 2018 15:34:27 [email protected] wrote:
> On Thursday 28 June 2018 13:03:58 [email protected] wrote:
> > On Monday 25 June 2018 08:31:08 Ricardo Signes wrote:
> > > * [email protected] [2018-06-25T05:08:32]
> > > > So what is status of Email::* modules? Does silence now mean that
> > > > modules are abandoned / unmaintained? I guess so.
> > > 
> > > You are mistaken.
> > > 
> > > The answer is the same as every other time you have asked:  I am here, I am
> > > alive, I am interested, and I am extremely busy, so these don't often make it
> > > to the top of my list.
> > > 
> > > We don't have any sort of sense of community here or a practice of shared code
> > > review, so everything comes down to "when does Rik have the time to consider
> > > each change."  That is "not all that often."
> > > 
> > > If we had three or four people who committed to create a better sense of group
> > > responsibility, maybe we'd see more progress.
> > 
> > On list are still more people interested in Email:: modules. Either as
> > direct users or developers of other Email:: modules.
> > 
> > So... is there somebody interested in doing some code review or
> > maintenance of Email:: modules?
> 
> Just in case, I have there open pull requests for more then year. If
> Ricardo does not have time to look at them yet, can somebody else do
> review? There is support for IDN email addresses or long and Unicode
> file names in attachments.
> 
> https://github.com/rjbs/Email-MIME-ContentType/pull/9
> https://github.com/rjbs/Email-MIME-ContentType/pull/10
> https://github.com/rjbs/Email-MIME-ContentType/pull/11
> 
> https://github.com/rjbs/Email-MIME/pull/49
> https://github.com/rjbs/Email-MIME/pull/50
> https://github.com/rjbs/Email-MIME/pull/51
> https://github.com/rjbs/Email-MIME/pull/54
> 
> https://github.com/rjbs/Email-Simple/pull/17

@rjbs: some of pull requests were already checked by @gedge.