Re: Please hold, a pumpking will be with you shortly
[email protected] (Andy Dougherty) Mon, 5 Aug 2002 12:10:29 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | perl.perl1.porters |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.SOL.4.10.10208051128170.2247-100000@maxwell.phys.lafayette.edu> |
On Sun, 4 Aug 2002, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> I'm currently travelling around and won't be ready to organize this show for
> a week or two yet. I've already put the wheels in motion to set up the
> necessary infrastructure, so that should all be ready to go once I've
> settled down.
One question before you go too far: Would you consider doing
perl2 instead of perl1? I ask because the perl2/Changes file lists
the following two items that I think are particularly relevant:
New regexp routines derived from Henry Spencer's.
Support for /(foo|bar)/.
Support for /(foo)*/ and /(foo)+/.
\s for whitespace, \S nonwhitespace
\d for digit, \D nondigit
The manual is now not lying when it says that perl is generally faster
than sed. I hope.
There's lots of other stuff too, but having the same basic regex
engine as later perls might be useful for benchmarking. Also,
> Small scale portability, modernization and bug fixes preferred.
lots of perl1 bug fixes can be found already implemented in the perl2
sources.
I recognize that perl2 doesn't have the same marketing appeal as perl1,
and that may ultimately be more important, but it's worth a moment's
thought.
--
Andy Dougherty [email protected]
Dept. of Physics
Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042