Re: Fwd: Module update for MARC::Record

As an administrator who doesn't use the module but is waiting for it to
be packaged on CPAN to more easily provide updates to users, I have to
say this is all great.

I see no strong reason to bump the version to 2.0.0, but I have no
objection either, especially if that feels appropriate to those who know
the code and features.

I would definitely object to a rename (i.e., Marc::Record2)--that would
just cause breakage, from my perspective.

Cory Snavely
University of Michigan Library IT Core Services


On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 14:48 -0500, Mike Rylander wrote:
> So it is written, so it shall be done.
> 
> I think, because of the number and size of the changes involved, it
> would be good to stamp the next version of MARC::Record as 2.0.0.
> There's a good bit of stuff that hasn't been very widely tested,
> though I know Evergreen and Koha use it on a daily basis, and a x.0.0
> version number implies newness.
> 
> It doesn't seem too off the mark (heh...) anyway, since the name
> MARC::Record2 (and variants) has been bandied about quietly in the
> past.
> 
> Thoughts/comments/sharp-sticks-in-the-eye?
>