Re: How convert data from USMARC to MARCXML using MARC::Record and it's derivatives? MARC.pm vs. MARC::Record.pm
[email protected] ("Dmitry Arsentiev")
| Newsgroups | perl.perl4lib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you for your forewarning, Bill. I hadn't grow up enough to get this error yet. 2008/9/2 Bill Dueber <[email protected]>: > Note that if you're working with XML at the record level that > MARC::File::XML has a bug (the logic for the 'as_xml_record' method is > reversed with respect to outputting XML headers). > > See this: > > http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=34082 > > It won't affect simple conversion, but is worth knowing about and fixing. > > > On 9/2/08 11:04 AM, "Galen Charlton" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 5:33 AM, Dmitry Arsentiev <[email protected]> wrote: >>> The question #1: Would it be right to develop my scripts with MARC.pm >>> and MARC::XML.pm, >>> or I should to develop only with MARC::Record >> >> I'd recommend using MARC::Record and MARC::File::XML. >> >>> The question #2: If I should to develop MARC::Record-based script, >>> can I easy convert from MARC to MARCXML, >>> or I've to write handler for each field I got >>> from MARC? >> >> It can be as easy as loading a MARC record into a MARC::Record object >> (e.g., $marc), then using the output of $marc->as_xml() or >> $marc->as_xml_record(). >> >> Regards, >> >> Galen > > -- > Bill Dueber > Library Systems Programmer > University Library, University of Michigan > 734.615.0412 > >