Re: MARC-perl: different versions yield different results

[email protected] (Al)
Newsgroups perl.perl4lib
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks, that does indeed do the trick.

   >MARC::Record 2.0.0, the so called unicode version, introduced the 
problem you describe.

Good to know. I hadn't gleaned that fact from all the messages I'd read.

I have a second, related question: MARC::Record 2.0.0 and Encode 2.40 are 
now more sensitive to leader byte 9. That is, if the leader is set 
incorrectly for the record's encoding, the program dies with a Unicode 
error. I deal with tens of thousands of records from a variety of sources 
and we simply must live with these bad records. I know how to prevent the 
program from dying and deal with these records by redefining 
Encode::decode() but that's a blanket solution that ignores all Encode 
errors. Is there a way to get the program to ignore just the leader 9 
mismatch errors (again taking into account the batch will contain a mixture 
of MARC 8 and UTF-8 encodings)?

Sample of 5 records with incorrect leader 9:
http://www.mediafire.com/file/4wf5mpa9zba5195/badrecs_sample.zip
The records are kind of large, sorry. The error occurs in the first record 
in the 505, sheet 17. Hsèuan-Ch'eng. The 3rd character of the name is a 
MARC 8 umlaut, \xE8.

Sample program:

use MARC::Batch;
use bytes;

my $batch = new MARC::Batch('USMARC', $ARGV[0]);
$batch->strict_off ();
$batch->warnings_off ();

my $record = $batch->next;
while ($record) {
    print $record->as_usmarc;
    $record = $batch->next;
}

The later version of MARC::Record will die on the first record. The earlier 
version will process them all.

Al


At 10/12/2010, Leif Andersson wrote:
 >This has nothing to do with Perl versions.
 >
 >MARC::Record 1.38 and earlier does not display this problem.
 >MARC::Record 2.0.0, the so called unicode version, introduced the problem
 >you describe.
 >That is when writing records: causing incorrect leader length and corrupted
 >utf-8
 >
 >There are different ways to deal with this.
 >Myself I have changed one of the modules.
 >
 >MARC::File::USMARC
 >It has a function called encode() around line 315
 >I have added a "use bytes;" just before the final return. Like this:
 >
 >use bytes;
 >return join("",$marc->leader, @$directory, END_OF_FIELD, @$fields,
 >END_OF_RECORD);
 >
 >To change directly in code like this is totally "no-no" to many programmers.
 >If you feel uncomfortable with this, there are other methods doing the same
 >stuff.
 >You could write a package:
 >
 >package MARC_Record_hack;
 >use MARC::File::USMARC;
 >no warnings 'redefine';
 >sub MARC::File::USMARC::encode() {
 >    my $marc = shift;
 >    $marc = shift if (ref($marc)||$marc) =~ /^MARC::File/;
 >    my ($fields,$directory,$reclen,$baseaddress) =
 >MARC::File::USMARC::_build_tag_directory($marc);
 >    $marc->set_leader_lengths( $reclen, $baseaddress );
 >    # Glomp it all together
 >    use bytes;
 >    return join("",$marc->leader, @$directory, "\x1E", @$fields, "\x1D");
 >}
 >use warnings;
 >1;
 >__END__
 >
 >With the inclusion of this package your original code should work fine, I'd
 >guess.
 >
 >
 >use MARC::Batch;
 >use MARC_Record_hack;
 >my $batch = new MARC::Batch('USMARC', $ARGV[0]);
 >$batch->strict_off ();
 >$batch->warnings_off ();
 >#binmode( STDOUT, ':raw' );
 >#binmode STDOUT;
 >my $record = $batch->next;
 >print $record->as_usmarc;
 >
 >
 >As a habit I use
 >binmode FH;
 >when I write records to file.
 >It is not needed, but it keeps me from the temptation of doing any other
 >assumptions about character encodings.
 >
 >/Leif Andersson
 >Stockholm University Library
 >
 >________________________________________
 >Från: Al [[email protected]]
 >Skickat: den 12 oktober 2010 00:03
 >Till: [email protected]
 >Ämne: MARC-perl: different versions yield different results
 >
 >Example marc record is here:
 >http://www.mediafire.com/file/u5cxkrfwh9ew09z/example.zip
 >
 >When I process the record above in perl 5.8, MARC::Record version 1.38, and
 >Encode.pm version 2.12, the record comes out fine.
 >
 >When I use perl 5.10, MARC::Record version 2.0.0, and Encode.pm 2.40 the
 >record comes out corrupted and MARC::Record will no longer read the result.
 >
 >The problem is with a Unicode character (big surprise). The earlier version
 >leaves the \xC3A1 character intact, the later version changes it to \xE1
 >which is invalid. I've read as many of the perl4lib messages on the subject
 >of UTF-8 as I could but my eyes are spinning. I'm hoping by including a
 >complete but simple perl program and making a MARC record available that
 >somebody can explain to me in detail what is going on. My inclination is to
 >simply revert to the earlier version of perl but perhaps if I really
 >understood the issue that may not be necessary.
 >
 >Here is the test program I use:
 >
 >use MARC::Batch;
 >my $batch = new MARC::Batch('USMARC', $ARGV[0]);
 >$batch->strict_off ();
 >$batch->warnings_off ();
 >#binmode( STDOUT, ':utf8' );
 >my $record = $batch->next;
 >print $record->as_usmarc;
 >
 >Run the program on the record, then run it again on the output and the
 >second time perl quits with an error:
 >
 >utf8 "\xE1" does not map to Unicode at Encode.pm line 174.
 >
 >That should not happen.
 >
 >Why the different behavior with the different versions? I can't see
 >anything wrong with the original record - it's valid UTF8 as far as I can
 >tell. Leader byte 9 is correctly set to 'a'. Uncommenting the binmode line
 >seems to work - the character is output unchanged as is supposed to happen.
 >The problem is my record batches are a mixture of UTF8 and MARC8 and
 >explicitly setting binmode screws things up. I need a solution that
 >transparently handles a mix of record encodings.
 >
 >I rather suspect the problem is with Encode.pm and not MARC perl but I
 >can't be sure. It also may be due to the way perl handles IO between
 >version 5.8 and 5.10. BTW the problem happens on Windows and Unix.
 >
 >Thanks for any advice you can give me,
 >
 >Al
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.