Re: Moose based Perl library for MARC records
[email protected] (Frédéric DEMIANS)
| Newsgroups | perl.perl4lib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Just a quick note: There is MARC::Fast[1] which should be named > Biblio::MARC because they share same API from end-user perspective. > > However, it was written before Biblio::Isis, so it ended up in wrong > place. > > I would prefer to have MooseX in name, because if I'm using Moose, I > don't really care about other MARC modules, and if I'm not, I'm not > interested in MARC module which requires it. > > Just my $0.02 :-) I wasn't aware of MARC::Fast... Biblio::Marc sounds good but if you plan to use it, you have the precedence of course. You're correct that a Moose based module could be an issue. Moose is not a small dependence. It could be an overhead. It used to be. I don't think it's the case anymore since Moose is so widespread today. There is no performance penalty in any persistent environment and even in a CLI program there is no perceptible difference. -- Frédéric