Re: [librecat-dev] A common MARC record path language
[email protected] (Thomas Berger) Wed, 19 Feb 2014 01:03:34 +0100
| Newsgroups | perl.perl4lib |
|---|---|
| Organization | Gymel.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 18.02.2014 17:47, schrieb Klee, Carsten: > I understand that there is MARC data combined with cataloging rules. We > don't use this approach within our MARC. So I'm not really aware of the problematics. "Your" MARC however will be very much interested in "/" (or "=") as the first character of some subfield in 245 if I recall correctly. Not such a big difference I would think. But maybe a slight complication of the matter, since MARCspec should have to cope with both approaches... Thomas Berger -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iJwEAQECAAYFAlMD9NYACgkQYhMlmJ6W47PzEQP/RIfm5bsHLTwhJMLJjNjF3vO/ XIpKt98CPUgy+hcFXc4hpTi+UH8j7NIWtaCyXYOfdL4xryzI0kEk98brZ/4TJG+9 IxzPZ8WDQL8bjX1hRTF8P4qjn/u+nyvDFFvdbM4kH7QhYhPeeWfoVqtCnMFHLzFJ 7v+o6x2CKH2MnfOcgGI= =yBFy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----