Re: [librecat-dev] A common MARC record path language

[email protected] (Thomas Berger) Wed, 19 Feb 2014 01:03:34 +0100
Newsgroups perl.perl4lib
Organization Gymel.com
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Am 18.02.2014 17:47, schrieb Klee, Carsten:

> I understand that there is MARC data combined with cataloging rules. We
> don't use this approach within our MARC. So I'm not really aware of the problematics.

"Your" MARC however will be very much interested in "/" (or "=") as the first
character of some subfield in 245 if I recall correctly. Not such a big
difference I would think. But maybe a slight complication of the matter,
since MARCspec should have to cope with both approaches...

Thomas Berger
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iJwEAQECAAYFAlMD9NYACgkQYhMlmJ6W47PzEQP/RIfm5bsHLTwhJMLJjNjF3vO/
XIpKt98CPUgy+hcFXc4hpTi+UH8j7NIWtaCyXYOfdL4xryzI0kEk98brZ/4TJG+9
IxzPZ8WDQL8bjX1hRTF8P4qjn/u+nyvDFFvdbM4kH7QhYhPeeWfoVqtCnMFHLzFJ
7v+o6x2CKH2MnfOcgGI=
=yBFy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----