Re: switch from byacc to bison
[email protected] Sat, 28 Feb 2004 17:44:35 -0500
| Newsgroups | perl.perl5.build |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF911E4F07.4FF92FE1-ON85256E48.007CCE5C-85256E48.007CEED8@factset.com> |
putting together a tarball and announcing it on [email protected] might elicit some response (sorry but I personally no longer have access to z/OS anymore). Peter Prymmer Nicholas Clark <[email protected]> Sent by: Nicholas To Clark Dave Mitchell <[email protected] <[email protected]> > cc Rafael Garcia-Suarez <[email protected]>, "H.Merijn 02/28/2004 10:15 Brand" <[email protected]>, AM [email protected], Leon Brocard <[email protected]> Subject Re: switch from byacc to bison On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 11:17:05PM +0000, Dave Mitchell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 11:39:32AM +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > But thinking about merging it, I ask myself "Is it binary compatible?" > > and I don't think I can answer this myself. > > Another consideration that has just occured to me (and relevant to 5.9.1 > too), is that I haven't had any feedback yet (good or bad) from EDCDIC > users; since I wrote the code 'blind' to handle that side of things, it > would be nice to know that it works before it gets into the wild. OK. This makes me wonder whether I wait until a blead snapshot (or the 5.9.1 release) on the assumption that it will be easier to get someone to test EDCDIC from a tarball than by rsyncing. I'm going to did through Jarkko's contact list to see who might be able to test. Nicholas Clark