RE: join() and split() to respect string overload operations

[email protected] ("Jan Dubois")
Newsgroups perl.perl5.porters
Organization ActiveState Software Inc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 07 Jun 2010, Paul LeoNerd Evans wrote:
> Now create a string-like object with well-behaved operator overload for
> concat, and observe you cannot still preserve the following identities:
> 
>   my $str = StringLike->new("Foo");
> 
>   substr( $str . "x", 0, len $str ) eq $str
>   substr( "x" . $str, 0, 1 ) eq $str
> 
>   substr( $str, 0, 1 ) . substr( $str, 1 ) eq $str

I don't quite get how this would not work as long as you also have a
well-behaved overload for 'eq' and '""'.  Or would these identities also be
broken:

   substr( $str . "x", 0, len $str ) eq "$str"
   substr( "x" . $str, 0, 1 ) eq "$str"
 
   substr( $str, 0, 1 ) . substr( $str, 1 ) eq "$str"

If these work, but yours don't, then I wouldn't consider the complete
set of overloads to be self-consistent.  If the these later identities
are broken as well, could you give an example of how to do it?

Cheers,
-Jan
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.