Re: proposed addition to perlvar

[email protected] (Tom Christiansen)
Newsgroups perl.perl5.porters
Message-ID <21161.1276098243@chthon>
In-Reply-To: Message from "Chas. Owens" <[email protected]>
   of "Wed, 09 Jun 2010 11:23:02 EDT." 
   <[email protected]>

>> I like what you have below for both, particularly the bit about the
>> warnings.  Could you please re-submit them in patch format?

> [ SNIP ]

> I moved both variables into a new section named "Deprecated Names"
> between "Predefined Names" and "Error Indicators".  I also change
> one of the examples in $# based on concern raised by some of the
> other emails.

Might we please consider coming up with some less remonstrative synonym
for "Deprecrated" to be used in cases such as this one here before us?

I ask this for two reasons.  The first is that "deprecated" has on occasion
been (mis-?)understood by some porters to mean meriting warnings, or slated
for expurgation, or both.  Lacking clearer understanding, I'd rather not
see that occur here.

But more importantly, while not at the tip of my fingers, I'm *pretty* sure I
recall certain operations that would be either more syntactically elaborate or
even simply impossible without the $#{ EXPR_FOR_ARRAY_NAME_OR_REF } notation.

I did say "pretty" sure, though, so perhaps I may be wrong.  Examples either
way are welcome.

--tom
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.