Re: Proposed feature: die on compile with undefined functions

[email protected] (Dan)
Newsgroups perl.perl5.porters
Message-ID <CABMkAVV=hkR+43i1qd5oun2rW_D4sNdk52xHYPR7D5RkhiY5Bw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 1:02 PM Michael Conrad <[email protected]> wrote:

> Optional strict flags would be nice.  Then people can decide whether to
> bundle it into their scope-setup modules like strictures or common::sense,
> etc.  I also think it could make sense as a "use v5.XX" feature bundle, but
> I wasn't suggesting breaking back-compat.
>

 Sort of off topic but: I see versioned feature bundles as sort of a middle
ground between optional features and compatibility breakage. It still
requires opting in, *but* it is an opt in that we want many people to
decide to do and has many varied effects, and when possible make it easy to
apply to existing code. This was one of my arguments for changing feature
bundles to 'v7', 'v8' etc to make it easier to remember what you're
getting, but as of yet that doesn't really fit into how Perl is developed.

-Dan
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.