Re: Approaching pre-5.44 code freeze; some recommendations
[email protected] (Scott Baker)
| Newsgroups | perl.perl5.porters |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I fully support staying ahead of things to make sure we actually release in May. I appreciate you getting the ball rolling. Is replacing the PRNG contentious? I don't think so, because there wasn't much push-back. The remaining pieces need to be addressed by someone with more core knowledge than I have. I think it's 90% complete other than making it thread-safe. -- Scottchiefbaker On 1/30/2026 5:43 AM, James E Keenan wrote: > In three weeks we reach our first critical milestone on the way to a > production release of perl-5.44, currently scheduled for May 20 2026. > That milestone is the "Contentious changes freeze" release of > perl-5.43.8 on February 20. > > At this time it behooves all of us who are active in development of > the Perl core distribution -- particularly committers and members of > the Perl Steering Council -- to ask: > > * What changes from perl-5.42 have we already made in core -- and are > we convinced those changes are no longer "contentious"? > > * What changes have we scheduled or talked about for perl-5.44 but > have not really implemented (*e.g.,* the fatalization of "Changing > "use VERSION" while another "use VERSION" is in scope" > (https://github.com/Perl/perl5/issues/23624))? > > * What BBC damage have we sustained since the perl-5.43 dev cycle > began, and what have we discovered from earlier dev cycles? What part > of this damage must be addressed by P5P, and what by CPAN > authors/moderators? What part of this damage needs to be addressed > before perl-5.44, and what are we prepared to live with? > > Speaking for myself, I would really like to see us release on our > target date and avoid deferring a production release until June or > July. But that would require us to begin addressing the questions > above now rather than wait until April. >