Re: using C11's _Atomic()
[email protected] (Tony Cook) Mon, 4 May 2026 09:31:37 +1000
| Newsgroups | perl.perl5.porters |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, May 03, 2026 at 05:49:40PM +0100, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> So I'm envisaging doing the following. I'll add a probe to Configure which
> tries to compile and run a small C program like:
>
> #include <stdatomic.h>
> _Atomic(int) count = 0;
>
> int
> main() {
> count++;
> count += 10;
> return count == 11 ? 0 : 1;
> }
Presumably you'd also want to ensure that _Atomic(int) is lock free,
either with ATOMIC_INT_LOCK_FREE or atomic_is_lock_free(), since
modifying locking atomics from a signal handler is UB.
Unfortunately sig_atomic_t is signal-safe but not thread-safe.
Tony