Re: Magic-v2, Clone, and a possible `sv_clone` API function

On Fri, 5 Jun 2026 18:17:55 +0200
Leon Timmermans <[email protected]> wrote:

> I can't help noticing that this sv_clone is almost the same thing as
> sv_dup (or probably sv_dup_inc), except that the new value doesn't
> live in a different interpreter.

Yes indeed - I was thinking that a suitable implementation would
probably adjust the way that sv_dup works so that the same internals
could handle both cases, and then be exposed as `sv_clone` as an API
function, and also used internally by the thread cloning behaviour.

-- 
Paul "LeoNerd" Evans

[email protected]
http://www.leonerd.org.uk/  |  https://metacpan.org/author/PEVANS