Re: Docs Testing Format (was Re: HOWTO: Writing Perl6 Tests)

[email protected] (Michael Lazzaro)
Newsgroups perl.perl6.documentation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tuesday, November 12, 2002, at 10:01  AM, Brent Dax wrote:
> Why use POD like this instead of a more atomic version of the standard
> testing format used by Perl 5?   We can use the directory structure to
> organize things.  Since most tests are not worthy of inclusion in the
> docs (do you really want "$foo eq reverse scalar reverse $foo" in the
> documentation for reverse()?) I don't see why we can't do this.

Dunno, looking for a way where we can harness the authors for producing 
tests in the least-intimidating way.  I'm not really thinking that the 
tests will be a useful, displayable part of the docs, but I figure the 
closer we can tie it into writing each docs section, the more likely 
we'll be to get contributors to actually think about it & do it.  I 
could be wrong there, tho...

MikeL
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.