RE: Project Start: Section 1

Andrew Wilson wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:16:53PM -0600, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:06:13PM -0600, Garrett Goebel wrote:
> > > Or if the leading = really must be required:
> > > 
> > > =*> level1
> > >     =>> level2
> > >         =+>>> level3
> > >               =*>>>> level4
> > >         =>>>  level3
> > > =>  level1
> 
> I don't like this much, I think it looks untidy.  We're you 
> planning to make the indentation mandatory?

Nope not mandatory, just easier on the reader's eyes it the author choses to
do so...

I don't imagine most people would switch back and forth between unordered
and ordered list. So an example similar to Scott's could be:

=*
=> level1
=>> level2
=>>> level3
=>>>> level4
=>>> level3
=>> level2
=> level1

and

=+
=> level1
=>> level2
=>>> level3
=>>>> level4
=>>> level3
=>> level2
=> level1

Assuming =* and =+ toggle the list unordered/ordered default. The =*> syntax
would assumably allow you to toggle the default for a specific level...

I'd be glad to take this off-list for anyone who'd like to continue this
thread...

Garrett