Re: The eternal "use XXX instead of POD" debate (was: Project Start: ?Section 1)

On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:40:05AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 03:50:34PM -0800, Damien Neil wrote:
> : I'd love to see a cleaner POD, with tables, better support for lists,
> : and the ability to turn syntax inferencing on a per-document basis.
> 
> We used a preprocessor to put tables into the POD for the Camel.
> Lists don't seem to occur all that often in technical docs, so it
> doesn't seem to be all that big a problem in practice, though we
> could certainly talk about improvements.  As for per-document policy,
> there should certainly be some kind of
> 
>     =use module
> 
> directive that, like Perl's C<use>, is something more than just an
> "include".

And has the freedom to change the grammar for pod text? And beyond?

Tim.