Re: Literal Values

On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:56:28 +0000, Joseph F. Ryan wrote:

> Alright, I have the tests done to match this section of the documentation.
> Well, everything except 'bit', since the last time I checked (and this
> could be resolved by now), there was some debate over Boolean types, and
> I know bit was included in this argument.  Also, I'm still not sure how
> hashes are supposed to interpolate within strings, and I'm also a bit
> unsure on how &() is supposed to work.
> 
> On another note, I redid my string and interpolation tests to conform with
> the Test::More-ish style (including TODO-block tests) that P6C currently
> uses.  Let me know if you like that better than what I did in that last
> message I sent.

For the most part, they look fine to me.  I'm a little concerned about some of
the numeric tests:

	output_is(<<'CODE', <<'OUT', "Simple Floats");
	print 4.5;
	print 0.0;
	print 13.12343
	CODE
	4.50.013.12343
	OUT

I'd be more comfortable with a newline between the numbers, just in case.  It's
not an issue in the string tests.

-- c