Re: The eternal "use XXX instead of POD" debate (was: Project Start: ?Section 1)

Larry Wall wrote on Tue, 12 Nov 2002 11:40:05 -0800:
>could certainly talk about improvements.  As for per-document policy, 
>there should certainly be some kind of
>
>     =use module
>
>directive that, like Perl's C<use>, is something more than just an "include".

I thought about putting something of the sort into perldpodspec and 
Pod::Simple, but didn't see a particularly clean way to have it so that 1) 
you wouldn't have to depend on a particular Pod-parsing module, and which 
2) could work in cases where the Pod-parser and the formatter are sanely 
segregated.

--
Sean M. Burke    http://search.cpan.org/author/sburke/