Re: Numeric Types

[email protected] wrote:
> Dave Whipp writes:
>  > 
>  > You can rename the types if you want; but properties are a better 
>  > representation of constraints than type names: more precise, and more 
>  > flexible.
>  > 
> 
> but types *are* properties . 
> 
> arcadi 

True :-(

But I think my examples somehow withstand that oversight. Parameterized 
properties are more expressive than named types.


Dave.