Re: Numeric literals, take 3
[email protected] (Andrew Wilson) Thu, 28 Nov 2002 01:43:49 +0000
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--NKoe5XOeduwbEQHU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 02:26:08PM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote: > Much nicer. This document holds together and makes more sense than > the first (as it should). Nice work. A couple of corrections and > nit-picks, though. Indeed it is, much nicer. =20 >> This won't work for bases greater than 36, so we have too: >=20 > s/too/as well/ ? It's less typo-looking. I would have said This won't work for bases greater than 36, so we also have: andrew --=20 Virgo: (Aug. 23 - Sept. 22) You're excited to get what you've always deserved until you realize it amounts to $4.27 in pizza coupons. --NKoe5XOeduwbEQHU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE95XTU4x3z39L355MRAriaAJ9oZqkKpY7h16zJjmD3jKazdN4jMgCeJAgr OSJcUkENag1z9fyBmOHBV0k= =ItLs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NKoe5XOeduwbEQHU--