Re: Numeric literals, take 3

[email protected] (Andrew Wilson) Thu, 28 Nov 2002 01:43:49 +0000
Newsgroups perl.perl6.documentation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--NKoe5XOeduwbEQHU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 02:26:08PM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
> Much nicer.  This document holds together and makes more sense than
> the first (as it should).  Nice work.  A couple of corrections and
> nit-picks, though.

Indeed it is, much nicer.
=20
>> This won't work for bases greater than 36, so we have too:
>=20
> s/too/as well/ ?  It's less typo-looking.

I would have said

This won't work for bases greater than 36, so we also have:

andrew
--=20
Virgo: (Aug. 23 - Sept. 22)
You're excited to get what you've always deserved until you realize it
amounts to $4.27 in pizza coupons.

--NKoe5XOeduwbEQHU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE95XTU4x3z39L355MRAriaAJ9oZqkKpY7h16zJjmD3jKazdN4jMgCeJAgr
OSJcUkENag1z9fyBmOHBV0k=
=ItLs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NKoe5XOeduwbEQHU--