Re: Numeric literals, take 3
[email protected] ("Bryan C. Warnock") 29 Nov 2002 00:27:46 -0500
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1038547666.2257.172.camel@wakko> |
On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 18:47, Bryan C. Warnock wrote: > Yes, but the first digit is 0. Or, more accurately, 0 * 16**2. Hmmph. Some accuracy. 0 * 16**1 -- Bryan C. Warnock bwarnock@(gtemail.net|raba.com)