Re: Backtracking through the source
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) Thu, 30 Nov 2000 11:14:42 -0500
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.internals.api.parser |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 05:07 AM 11/30/00 +0000, David Grove wrote: >Dan: In any PDD generated from this group, we really need to define for >the "semantically challenged" the terms that are used within it: No, I don't think that's appropriate. Any new terminology specific to the PDD should be defined, but that's it. Perl terms not specific to the PDD should be defined elsewhere (either in an RFC or PDD). For everything else, there's the bibliograpy. If you (and this is the generic you here) aren't up to speed on the basics of the field (parser design, optimizer design, interpreter design, whatever) it's best to get up to speed first. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [email protected] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk