Re: [perl #45857] [IMCC][RFC] #line vs .line

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:00 AM, Patrick R. Michaud <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 02:31:58AM +0100, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> > Oh, argh, so .line now carries the file *and* the line number?.I wanted
> > it to just carry the line number (the clue's in the name... ;-)) and
> > have .file carry the filename. Then the source you compiled from one
> > file has one ".file 'foo.pir'" directive, and then you just have ".line
> > 42" style things for lines.
>
> Either way works for me -- PCT can generate either without much
> difficulty.  It probably makes more sense to have separate .file
> and .line directives.  In particular, I wouldn't want to be
> repeating the .file annotation information throughout the bytecode!  :-)
>

well, I guess that's two +1's for the proposal in RT#59830 :-)

kjs