Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicing

At 12:43 PM 8/29/00 -0400, Karl Glazebrook wrote:
>Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > >It would be bad to have multiple RFCs suggesting the same thing.
> >
> > Nope, it wouldn't be.
> >
> > Don't assume that any particular RFC will be accepted in its entirety
> > either--it's always possible that Larry'll take the good bits and leave the
> > rest...
>
>Meanwhile we all go rambling around on cross-threads and come up
>with no coherent set of proposals.

So? If the idea has merit, it'll make it into one or more RFCs, and Larry's 
rather good at making things coherent. If it just putters around for a 
while on the list, then maybe it's really not worth all that much.

					Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[email protected]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk