Re: no autovivify?

>Tom Christiansen wrote:
>> 
>> If you can no longer grow hashes or arrays on demand, does this
>> extend to strings not being able to get bigger, and to integers not
>> being able to become floats?
>> 
>> --tom

>Exactly.  What do you think :closed should do, Tom?

Something more like old :ronly hack? :-)

I've never actually wanted to limit my numbers, strings, or arrays.
And the only reason I've ever wanted to limit my hashes is when I
was thinking of them as records, not hashes, and wanted typo-protection.

Implicitly creating things on demand is quite perlish, no?

-tom