Re: RFC 272 (v1) Arrays: transpose()

Karl Glazebrook wrote:
> Jeremy Howard wrote:
> >
> > BTW, I notice that you're using dimension numbering starting at 0 for
your
> > transpose() examples. Is everyone happy to start at 0 rather than 1?
>
> OF COURSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> anything else would be WRONG
>
Well, one can't argue with logic like that! ;-)

(I don't mind either way... we can either be consistent with reshape and
:shape (starts at 1) or indexing (starts at 0) but not both...)